Charleston DUI News for 01-03-2018

SC Sen. Paul Campbell charged with DUI in Lowcountry wreck

A South Carolina lawmaker – and chairman of the Senate Ethics Committee – is accused of lying to police after rear-ending a car in the Lowcountry, allegedly while under the influence, according to authorities. Sen. Paul Campbell, 71, of Goose Creek, was charged with DUI and providing false information to police, according to Charleston County jail records. “The charges are one thing; let’s see what comes out in court,” Campbell told The State newspaper when reached by a reporter Sunday. “I think I’m innocent, and I think in the court case it’ll come out that way. I just tell people ‘Don’t judge me on the charge, judge me on the court case.'”. Troopers eventually determined that Campbell was driving the 2017 Mercedes SUV, Collins said. After Campbell failed field sobriety tests, he was charged with DUI and providing false information to police. No injuries were reported in the collision, which Collins said caused minor damage to both vehicles. Campbell provided a breath sample that yielded a.09 percent blood-alcohol content, Collins said. Campbell’s wife Vicki, who was the passenger in the car, also was charged with providing false information to police, Collins said. “I’ve just been told to keep my mouth shut about it and see what comes out in court,” he said. Campbell, who has represented Berkeley, Charleston and Dorchester counties in the S.C. Senate since 2007, chairs the Senate Ethics Committee. Savage represented Michael Slager, a white former North Charleston police officer who fatally shot a black motorist named Walter Scott in April 2015. Campbell was released from jail late Sunday morning on personal recognizance, according to online court records. Providing false information to police is a misdemeanor that carries up to 30 days in jail or a $200 fine, under South Carolina law. First-time DUI offenders face a misdemeanor charge and a maximum 30-day jail sentence, as well as a fine and court costs.

Keywords: [“Campbell”,”police”,”court”]

Underage DUI Charges In South Carolina

In South Carolina, a person who is under the age of 21 and operates a motor vehicle after drinking alcohol will be subjected to the state’s zero tolerance policy. A person under the age of 21 who drives with a blood alcohol concentration of.02 percent or greater will be charged with underage drinking and driving. If a law enforcement officer suspects an underage driver of DUI, they can charge the individual under South Carolina’s Zero Tolerance Law. Traditional DUI requires a blood alcohol content of 0.8 percent or higher. With a driver under 21, a BAC of 0.2 percent or higher will get them charged with DUI. This means the majority of individuals who are under 21 will be over the legal limit after one drink. Should the person who is arrested for underage DUI be suspended under the Zero Tolerance law, there won’t be any prosecution for criminal DUI. Penalties for Underage DUI in South Carolina. Should a person under the age of 21 be found guilty of DUI, they could have their driver’s license or permit suspended or withheld. When an underage DUI case is pending, the individual charged with the DUI is entitled to an Administrative Hearing. If a minor is charged with DUI, things will be much worse if they are suspected of being in possession or using a fake ID to obtain or buy alcohol. When a minor is convicted of DUI, they may lose their ability to obtain sufficient insurance in the future. It is common for insurance companies to deny policies to people who have a minor DUI conviction on their record. South Carolina works hard to prevent minors from having access to alcohol. The penalties associated with an adult providing alcohol to a minor are covered in S.C. Code 61-6-4070(1). There are exceptions such as a minor being provided alcohol by their parent’s in their parent’s residence. A minor can serve alcohol in a restaurant, but are not permitted to mix liquors or work as a bartender.

Keywords: [“DUI”,”alcohol”,”drives”]

Charleston & Mt. Pleasant DWI Defense

DUI enforcement is extensive and aggressive in South Carolina. Your Charleston DUI attorney must be aggressive as well. Ideally, your lawyer should have years of experience, with a strong track record of successful case outcomes. Have you been caught up in South Carolina’s “Sober or Slammer” anti-DUI/DWI campaign? Were you arrested on suspicion of driving under the influence of alcohol because you were snagged in a so-called sobriety checkpoint trap? Did police consider you guilty before investigating the facts simply because you had alcohol on your breath? Is “Buzzed driving” really drunk driving, as the publicity campaign states? Get your driver’s license back now! Drennan Law Firm wins tough DUI cases, including tough felony DUI arrests. Drennan Law Firm is prepared to put up a fair and effective fight on your behalf. From our law offices in Charleston and Mount Pleasant, we aggressively represent people charged with DUI. We invite you to contact us to schedule a free consultation. Being stopped or arrested or charged with driving under the influence of alcohol does not mean you have been proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Contrary to popular belief, it is not against the law to drink and then drive. Rather, it is against the law to drive while appreciably impaired: mentally, physically and materially. An effective DUI defense attorney takes up the challenge of protecting your rights through all phases of a drunk driving case. A poor outcome during a sobriety test is not the equivalent of a guilty DUI verdict in a court of law. Do not let a police officer imply that your case is a sealed, slam-dunk conviction before you have had your day in court. A strong defense in a DWI/DUI case begins with a carefully prepared appearance in an administrative hearing before the Department of Public Safety. Our experienced Charleston DUI lawyers welcome the opportunity to evaluate your case, with no further obligation unless you choose to proceed.

Keywords: [“DUI”,”drive”,”case”]

Charleston DUI News for 12-15-2017

Best Charleston Lawyer

The focus of survey questions was on demographics, occurrence of rigid board insulation, prevalence of rigid board insulation damage and structural damage, and treatment of structures when rigid board insulation was present. Results indicated termite infestations associated with rigid board insulation are not uncommon; 34% of the companies reported the presence of rigid board insulation on structures that have been treated or inspected for termites. Rigid board insulation, primarily foam board insulation, includes materials such as polystyrene and polyisocyanurate. Rigid board insulation is used as a perimeter insulation around structures; the insulation is usually placed against the foundation walls on the exterior of the masonry structure hidden from view by skin coats such as wood, aluminum or vinyl siding, or stucco. The content of questions consisted of four types: demographics, occurrence of rigid board insulation, prevalence of rigid board insulation damage and structural damage, and treatment of structures when rigid board insulation was present. Occurrence of Rigid Board Insulation The documented presence of rigid board insulation on structures treated or inspected for termites was reported by 34% of the companies. As many as 81% of companies reported up to 10% of structures they treated and/ or inspected for termites had rigid board insulation, and 2% of the companies reported greater than 75% of the structures had rigid board insulation. Prevalence of Rigid Board Insulation Damage and Structural Damage Eighty-one percent of the companies reported termite damage to rigid board insulation installed above grade in up to 10% of the structures they inspected. Seventy-two percent of the companies reported termite damage to rigid board insulation installed below grade in up to 10% of the structures they inspected, and 9% of the companies reported termite damage to rigid board insulation installed below grade in greater than 75% of the structures. Excessive termite damage to rigid board insulation was seen by 10% of the companies, whereas moderate and slight damage to insulation was seen by 40% and 50% of the companies, respectively. Responses for the latter category were: trenched out below the insulation, treated, and backfilled; cut insulation off above grade and then sealed bottom of insulation; recommended that a qualified builder replace insulation and check structure for soundness; pretreated but did not know rigid board insulation was later installed; only treated if insulation was not below grade; modified guarantee such that company was not responsible for damage as a result of hidden entry through insulation; treated as result of having won a bid. Location Between grade level and footings Just below grade At grade level Between grade level and sill plate Above the sill plate Correlation Coefficient p-Value 0.2443 0.7657 0.4725 0.6832 0.5244 0.5598 0.0037 0.1030 0.0006 0.0658 cluded: customer did not want insulation removed; gave job to another company; recognized situation due to previous problems experienced with this type of insulation. The Model Energy Code states the following for slab-on-grade floors, i.e. monolithic slab construction: “In climates below 6,000 annual Fahrenheit heating degree days, the insulation shall extend downward from the top of the slab for a minimum distance of 24 inches greater than 6,000 annual Fahrenheit heating degree days, the insulation shall extend downward from the top of the slab for a minimum of 48 inches”. Chose to treat % Chose not to treat % Treated as they would any other structure and provided a guarantee 24 Insulation created a situation conducive to termite infestation that was not treatable or correctable Could not guarantee the treatment Did something other than above options 34 Treated but did not provide a guarantee Removed insulation below grade Did something other than above options 33 31 13 45 21 the country. The benefits of removing a small gap of insulation above grade level along the perimeter of structures would certainly outweigh the costs in the long run; additional insulation can be placed elsewhere in the structure to recoup the thermal loss from this adjustment.

Keywords: [“insulation”,”board”,”Church”]

Assemblies of God Official Web Site

From its inception, the Assemblies of God has been unequivocally committed to abstinence from alcoholic beverages, a conviction firmly rooted in what the Bible teaches about the abuse of wine, the consumption of strong drink, and also in its cardinal ethical principle of love for God and others. As the pressures to participate in moderate consumption of wine and other alcoholic beverages mount, it is imperative that the long-standing Assemblies of God position on abstinence be reaffirmed in light of both the Scriptures and societal practice in order to faithfully witness to each generation and to continue to confront unjust and destructive social ills that harm people whom God loves. Since appeals to approve moderate drinking are often based on wine use in the Bible, it is critically important to understand the differences between the production and use of wine in biblical times, and the more deceptive and dangerous use of alcoholic beverages today. There are several major differences: wine of the biblical era generally had lower alcohol content, ancient wine was commonly diluted before consumption, grapes were a staple of ancient agrarian life and commerce requiring preservation of the juice, and the distillation process for liquors had not yet been fully developed. Neither biblical nor historical references to mixed or diluted wine prove that everyone always diluted their wine, but the references do show it was a common practice. In the Parable of the Good Samaritan, the wounded traveler was treated by “Pouring on oil and wine”.5 The healing and antiseptic properties of wine are probably reflected in Paul’s admonitions to Timothy to “Stop drinking only water, and use a little wine [oinos] because of your stomach and your frequent illnesses”. Tirosh is defined as “Fresh or new wine, must,7 grape juice” and most modern translations usually render it as “New wine”. Unfermented grape juice or juice in the early stages of fermentation is identified in the Gospels as “New wine”.9Gleukos, used once, refers to “a new sweet wine in process of fermentation.”10Sikera, also used once, is “An intoxicating drink made from grain.”11Oxos, translated as “Sour wine” or “Wine vinegar” is found six times in the crucifixion accounts. Old TestamentWine often is portrayed favorably as in verses such as Psalm 104:14-15: “He makes grass grow for the cattle, and plants for people to cultivate-bringing forth food from the earth: wine [yayin] that gladdens human hearts, oil to make their faces shine, and bread that sustains their hearts.” This theme is also found elsewhere, e.g., “May God give you heaven’s dew and earth’s richness-an abundance of grain and new wine [tirosh]”. “Who has woe? Who has sorrow? Who has strife? Who has complaints? Who has needless bruises? Who has bloodshot eyes? Those who linger over wine [yayin], who go to sample bowls of mixed wine. Do not gaze at wine [yayin] when it is red, when it sparkles in the cup, when it goes down smoothly! In the end it bites like a snake and poisons like a viper”. Only one of these thirteen references affirms the use of wine, Paul’s directive to Timothy to “Stop drinking only water, and use a little wine because of your stomach and your frequent illnesses”. What is startling in the Revelation is that, other than two neutral references to wine as vintage or cargo, wine is used metaphorically for either human sin or God’s final eschatological wrath. The strongest drink possible in biblical times was not a modern fortified wine with 14-20 percent alcohol content, much less bourbon or tequila at 40-50 percent alcohol content, but naturally fermented wine or beer with a maximum possible alcohol content of 10-11 percent. God pronounces woe to those who run after their strong drink and are inflamed by wine. The clear prohibition of Old Testament priests drinking wine while serving in the tabernacle/temple, the vow of the Nazirite not to drink wine, the tradition of the Rekabites, the examples of John the Baptist and Timothy-all have deep spiritual significance for today’s Christian leaders.

Keywords: [“wine”,”drink”,”alcohol”]