Best DWI and DUI Lawyers

Seth Rose is a graduate of the University of South Carolina School of Law and a former Richland County Assistant Solicitor-a position in which he prosecuted at trial various crimes, including DUI, Drug & alcohol offenses, burglary, armed robbery, and even murder. The founding partners became good friends first while attending law school at the University of South Carolina over 25 years ago. In addition to drinking beer and learning law, Art taught Robert how to sail on Lake Murray. Rew’s family law practice is dedicated to providing focused attention to each of his clients, and he has experience resolving a variety of legal problems, including criminal defense, DUI, divorce, and personal injury law. Mr. Johnson opened his office in Columbia after graduating from the University of South Carolina School of Law. We help families when they are restructuring and need a family law attorney. The lawyer you select should be experienced and tested, respected among his peers and adversaries, knowledgeable in the law, adept in and out of the courtroom, skilled in the art of persuasion, tireless in his cause, and passionate in the pursuit of justice. Milling Law Firm, LLC is dedicated to serving those in need, and strives to secure the best possible resolution under the circumstances, whether it may be through trial or negotiation. No one can promise you a particular result, but the Milling Law Firm, LLC can promise to use the best efforts and best abilities to obtain the best result possible. Michael practices criminal defense law, and has since 1998. We have searched to find the best DUI attorneys / lawyers in Charleston; those who are experienced with DUI law and who know how to deal with the affects of being arrested for DUI. These top-rated attorneys focus a significant portion of their practices to defending those accused of DUI and they understand that the consequences of a DUI conviction can destroy reputations, families, careers, and finances. These best DUI attorneys of Columbia are continually learning and staying abreast of the latest changes in DUI laws in the state of South Carolina and have demonstrated an ability to navigate through a Columbia courtroom. When you have an attorney who is experienced with DUI offenses you will feel more confident and calmer than when you are dealing with someone who is a general practice attorney who takes any and all cases. Attorneys accepted as the best DUI lawyers in Columbia must show they devote a significant portion of their practice to DUI defense. Lawyers chosen to be a part of Best DWI Lawyers are experts in their field and we choose who will be rated with Best DWI Lawyers.

Keywords: [“Law”,”DUI”,”best”]

Daniel A. Selwa, II Attorney At Law, LLC

The DUI Laws are working as Intended In 2014 a Post and Courier article cites the Charleston Chief of Police who provides the example of a woman who they had to charge with public disorderly conduct instead of DUI because she was sitting in her car, the officer never saw her drive the car, and the officer did not have a videotape available. The point is, if you cannot see the person’s feet, there is no evidence of what the person’s feet were doing – it is not helpful to view a person’s legs as the officer tells us their recollection of what the feet were doing. A prosecutor cites an example of a case where “It was dark and the driver’s face couldn’t be seen on camera as the officer had the driver close his eyes and touch his nose.” First of all, closing your eyes and touching your nose is not a standardized field sobriety test approved by NHTSA and the officer should not have been administering it in the first place. If the officer is going to use a non-standardized FST, it should be visible on the camera. It may be dark, but the officer’s car is equipped with headlights as well as a camera. A legislator complains that a defendant can create their own defense by doing something that takes them off the camera through no fault of the officer. 2) It is on the officer to ensure that the FST’s are administered properly and that they are recorded. 1) You will never see a defendant’s eyes well enough on the video to confirm or debunk the officer’s testimony about the HGN, and I have never seen a judge dismiss a DUI on this basis. It is critical to be able to see how the officer performs the test, because many officers do not perform the test properly. ” Hurts who? The prosecutor’s office? There is no Loophole. In cases where the driver is too drunk to drive and where the officer follows the statute, the prosecutor will get a conviction unless they use the law as an excuse to dismiss cases and lighten their case load. When the officer follows the law and the driver is drunk, the prosecutor has competent evidence to use at trial. When the officer does not follow the law and/or the driver is not drunk, the case will get dismissed. If you believe that police officers are routinely honest and transparent during traffic stops including DUI arrests, you have never worked in the criminal courts or you are incredibly naive. The videotape requirements are intended to prevent officers from conducting FST’s out of the camera’s view and then lying about the results, and for this reason alone they are necessary. It’s the best practice to protect you and I from officers who will lie or exaggerate their testimony to obtain convictions.

Keywords: [“office”,”prosecutor”,”case”]