CONNECTICUT DUI LAWS
You asked about Connecticut laws on driving under the. The law establishes administrative license suspension procedures for drivers who refuse to submit to a test or whose test results indicate an elevated BAC. A different procedure allowing a more immediate suspension applies if the driver has a prior license suspension for a DUI conviction or has been involved in a fatal accident. Two public acts approved in the 2011 session drastically change the license suspension law for people convicted of DUI. These actsshorten the amount of time a license is suspended, extend the period that an individual must drive only vehicles equipped with ignition interlock devices, and apply the interlock restrictions to drivers on their first, rather than their second, DUI conviction. The court may also order an individual arrested for DUI, 2nd-degree manslaughter with a motor vehicle, or 2nd-degree assault with a motor vehicle to operate only motor vehicles equipped with ignition interlock devices as a condition of release on bail probation, or granting his or her application to take part in the Pretrial Alcohol Education Program, and 2nd-degree assault with a motor vehicle, apply to drivers who cause the death or serious injury of another person, respectively, while under the influence of alcohol or drugs. The DUI law applies to drivers operating a motor vehicle anywhere, including the operator. In practice, the first conviction of a driver for DUI is usually for the driver. The Connecticut Supreme Court has held that administrative license suspensions legitimately provide for public safety by promptly removing drivers charged with DUI from the road, and that a suspension is not a bar to criminal prosecution. May, at the request of anyone whose license is suspended for DUI on that date, reduce the suspension and instead require the motorist to drive only a vehicle equipped with an ignition interlock for the remainder of the original suspension period. A driver is ineligible to operate a motor vehicle with an ignition interlock if his or her license was suspended for any reason other than conviction of DUI, 2nd-degree manslaughter with a motor vehicle, or 2nd-degree assault with a motor vehicle. A police officer must impound for 48 hours the motor vehicle of anyone he or she arrests for DUI whose right to drive in Connecticut is under suspension or revocation.
Chestney & Sullivan DUI Defense Firm
Mr. Chestney is board certified in DUI defense by NCDD and Mr. Sullivan is a former prosecutor. Contact Chestney & Sullivan today to see how this very important court decision may impact your DUI case. Whether you were out in Atlanta with friends and loved ones, at a party, or attending an event, being arrested for a Georgia DUI can be a stressful experience – especially if you have been summoned to appear in court in Atlanta the very next business day! You probably have many questions about penalties for a DUI in Georgia, the court process, and possible defenses you may have in your case. At Chestney & Sullivan, all we do is defend DUI charges and other serious driving offenses – and have been exclusively and effectively doing so for 25 years and counting! We represent clients across the state, from those charged with drunken driving in northern Georgia cities such as Alpharetta, Canton, Cumming, Dawsonville, Decatur, Gainesville, Johns Creek, Marietta, Milton, Roswell to those arrested by the Atlanta DUI Task Force or Georgia State Patrol Nighthawks all the way down to Peachtree City, Macon, LaGrange, and as far east as Athens to Carrollton in west Georgia and beyond. Mr. Chestney is board certified in DUI Defense by the National College for DUI Defense and Mr. Sullivan is a former prosecutor. These are only some of the strategies that would make a seemingly indefensible case a winnable case! All of our experienced Georgia DUI lawyers have dedicated themselves to providing the best DUI defense possible. If you have been arrested by a Georgia DUI Task Force officer or Georgia State Patrol Nighthawk DUI Task Force Trooper, you should have been served notice of an administrative license suspension action. Having our experienced Georgia DUI attorneys properly navigate and defend the criminal case and the administrative license suspension action can improve your chances of being able to drive and avoiding a Georgia DUI conviction. Even if you decide not to contest your Georgia DUI case, our experienced DUI attorneys in Georgia who are familiar with the particular court your case is pending in can assess a plea offer to determine if it is worth accepting or rejecting and take your case to trial. The experienced Atlanta-based DUI attorneys at Chestney & Sullivan will zealously investigate and defend every aspect of your arrest.
Pennsylvania DUI Case Law
I’m researching a point of law on the two-hour rule. I came across a fellow attorneys’ site that has a great list of Pennsylvania DUI cases. 83 – Sheriffs lack authority to conduct and operate DUI roadblocks without assistance of police officers. b.Under the rational basis test, the statute’s two-hour rule is not overbroad as being beyond the state’s police power or by criminalizing constitutionally protect activity, because the state has a legitimate interest in curbing alcohol- or drug-related accidents, and driving after drinking or after using illegal or controlled substances is not a constitutionally protected activity. a. Under the rational basis test, the statute’s two-hour rule is not overbroad as being beyond the state’s police power or by criminalizing constitutionally protect activity, because the state has a legitimate interest in curbing alcohol- or drug-related accidents, and driving after drinking or after using illegal or controlled substances is not a constitutionally protected activity. b. Because neither a suspect class nor a fundamental right is involved in an equal protection challenge to the DUI laws, the proper inquiry is whether a rational basis exists for the legislative classification and whether that classification has a fair and substantial relationship to the object of the legislation. Section 3802(d)(1) does not violate equal protection because it treats all drivers similarly. v. Thur, 906 A.2d 552 – It is constitutionally permissible to require a driver to predict his Blood Alcohol Content at some reasonable future time after drinking; furthermore, the legislature’s attempt to more affectively deter drunk driving by extending the time period in which elevated BAC is outlawed is rational and does not offend due process. Alexander v. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing, 583 Pa. 592 – Prior convictions of DUI within the last ten years that occurred before the enactment of the interlock law are still considered prior offenses for sentencing purposes. v. Downs, 739 A.2d 569 – You may be charged with Driving on a Suspend license for a DUI-related offense even if you have completed service of the DUI suspension, but have not had your operating privilege restored by the state department of transportation.